Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.
Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.
Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.
A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.
"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.
Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.
The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.
Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.
"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."
She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."
Not all testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.
These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.
Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.
According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.
According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."
Elara is a passionate esports journalist with over a decade of experience covering major gaming events and trends.