This is somewhat awkward to reveal, but here goes. A handful of books sit next to my bed, every one only partly read. On my phone, I'm some distance through 36 audiobooks, which looks minor alongside the nearly fifty Kindle titles I've set aside on my Kindle. This does not count the growing stack of advance versions near my living room table, vying for blurbs, now that I have become a established author in my own right.
On the surface, these numbers might seem to corroborate contemporary opinions about current concentration. A writer observed recently how easy it is to distract a person's concentration when it is divided by digital platforms and the news cycle. They remarked: “Maybe as people's concentration change the literature will have to adapt with them.” Yet as an individual who used to stubbornly finish whatever book I began, I now consider it a personal freedom to stop reading a book that I'm not enjoying.
I wouldn't feel that this habit is caused by a limited attention span – instead it relates to the sense of existence passing quickly. I've consistently been impressed by the spiritual maxim: “Hold mortality each day in view.” Another point that we each have a just finite period on this Earth was as shocking to me as to anyone else. But at what previous moment in human history have we ever had such instant entry to so many amazing creative works, at any moment we choose? A wealth of treasures greets me in every bookshop and within every digital platform, and I aim to be deliberate about where I direct my time. Might “not finishing” a book (shorthand in the publishing industry for Unfinished) be rather than a sign of a poor intellect, but a discerning one?
Especially at a time when the industry (consequently, selection) is still dominated by a specific group and its quandaries. Even though reading about individuals different from ourselves can help to build the muscle for compassion, we furthermore read to consider our personal lives and place in the society. Unless the books on the displays better represent the backgrounds, realities and issues of potential individuals, it might be extremely difficult to keep their focus.
Naturally, some authors are indeed effectively creating for the “today's attention span”: the short writing of certain current novels, the compact pieces of additional writers, and the quick sections of numerous recent books are all a excellent demonstration for a briefer approach and method. Additionally there is an abundance of writing advice aimed at grabbing a audience: perfect that opening line, polish that start, increase the tension (more! higher!) and, if writing mystery, put a dead body on the beginning. That advice is completely solid – a possible representative, editor or audience will use only a several precious minutes deciding whether or not to continue. There is no benefit in being obstinate, like the writer on a workshop I participated in who, when confronted about the plot of their novel, announced that “it all becomes clear about three-quarters of the way through”. No novelist should put their reader through a sequence of 12 labours in order to be comprehended.
And I certainly write to be clear, as to the extent as that is feasible. Sometimes that needs holding the audience's hand, guiding them through the story step by succinct beat. At other times, I've realised, insight takes perseverance – and I must grant me (and other writers) the permission of meandering, of building, of deviating, until I hit upon something true. An influential thinker contends for the story developing innovative patterns and that, instead of the traditional plot structure, “other forms might assist us imagine novel methods to make our narratives alive and authentic, continue making our works novel”.
Accordingly, the two opinions converge – the story may have to change to accommodate the today's audience, as it has continually done since it first emerged in the historical period (in the form today). Perhaps, like past writers, coming writers will return to releasing in parts their works in newspapers. The future these creators may even now be publishing their work, part by part, on web-based sites such as those used by countless of regular readers. Genres shift with the era and we should allow them.
But we should not say that every changes are all because of limited focus. If that were the case, brief fiction anthologies and very short stories would be viewed much more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Elara is a passionate esports journalist with over a decade of experience covering major gaming events and trends.